March 28, 2024

Terrorist Quds Force affiliated teams fire Katusha rockets at Camp Ashraf

NCRI – On Sunday evening, around 20:00 hours (Baghdad local time) terror teams affiliated with the Iranian regime’s terrorist Quds Force targeted Camp Ashraf with Katusha rockets that landed inside the southern section of the camp near where the housing units of the residents.

On Thursday, General Hossein Hamedani,  a commander of Iranian regime’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) acknowledged, in an interview with IRGC’s Fars news agency , that he had been personally to Camp Ashraf for reconnaissance activities and setting the stage for an attack against the camp.  

Since one week ago, some 400 agents of Iranian regime’s Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS) had been stationed in a building complex in northern part of Ashraf. The building had been occupied by the Iraqi forces during their attack on camp on April 8, 2011.

Therefore, the Iranian regime and its terrorist Quds Force are the ones that are in practice exercising their “sovereignty” over the camp area.
 
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 25, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11568-terrorist-quds-force-affiliated-teams-fire-katusha-rockets-at-camp-ashraf

Abandoning America’s Iraqi and Iranian allies

UNITE PRESS INTERNATIONAL

WASHINGTON, Dec. 23 (UPI) — As U.S. troops head home from Iraq, Americans welcome them with open arms and take pride in others who risked their lives to support the U.S. side — direct hires like translators left behind plus Iraqi and Iranian supporters.

U.S. diplomats actively manage a crisis in the Iraqi Parliament between Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki‘s supporters against former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and Iraqiya, his multi-sectarian group of mainly Sunni and moderate Shiite Muslims. The crisis involves another major Sunni — Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi, who escaped to the Kurdish area because of an arrest warrant on apparently trumped-up charges he ran a death squad.

American envoys pay too little attention to Iraqi and Iranian facilitators of the wartime effort and needs them to counter al-Qaida of Iraq and Tehran’s efforts to destabilize Iraq.

Consider the contribution of Sunni tribal partners to a drop in violence during 2007-08. They added weight to the increase in American boots on the ground. Although the surge receives the credit for decreasing violence, an “awakening” among Arab tribes removed over 100,000 Sunnis — a political surge reinforcing the U.S. military surge.

U.S. Barack Obama, D-Ill., stated Oct. 22, 2008, in Time magazine that “The Sunni awakening changed the dynamic in Iraq fundamentally. It could not have occurred unless there were some contacts and intermediaries to peel off those who are tribal leaders, regional leaders (and) Sunni nationalists.”

My trip to Iraq in October 2008 validated Obama’s hunch: I met scores of Iraqi awakening tribesmen of Sheik Ahmed Abu Risha, a Sunni leader from Ramadi west of Baghdad. In exchange for reinforcing the American surge, they expected protection. But Washington is leaving such Sunni partners “in limbo.”

Other Iraqi friends who assisted the U.S. military are moderate Shiites from Iraq’s southern provinces. Sheik Walid told me he joined the fight against al-Qaida of Iraq after meeting with U.S. military forces in Camp Ashraf, home to Iranian dissidents in Iraq, the Mujahedin-e-Khalq.

Tearing a page from Obama’s playbook about interlocutors helping Iraqis join the American alignment against al-Qaida, Sheik Walid explained that his tribe had dozens of trilateral meetings with the U.S. military mediated by the MeK in Camp Ashraf.

While al-Qaida of Iraq has almost been decimated by U.S. Special Operations raids, there are indications of resurgence. Sunni tribes may be the best antidote to al-Qaida but might not be as trusting after being ditched by Washington and isolated by Baghdad.

Washington is also leaving its former Iranian partners in danger. While Sunnis and moderate Shiites are imperiled, Iraqis can blend into the culture, an option unavailable to Iranian dissidents. As opponents of Tehran, they are endangered outside the relatively safe confines of Camp Ashraf.

Even the camp is a risky place because Iraqi forces launched bloody assaults against these unarmed Iranian civilians in July 2009 and April 2011; Baghdad threatened to remove camp residents forcibly this month to put a coda on the U.S. withdrawal. Even though Iraq extended the timeline until mid-2012 for its move against the camp, its residents remain at risk.

The U.S. State Department’s plan, ostensibly to save the Iranian dissidents, trusts twice violated Iraqi assurances they would be treated humanely if they would leave the camp for a former U.S. base — Camp Liberty. The department wrongly blames MeK leaders in Paris of preventing Ashraf rank and file acceptance of this plan.

On the basis of my interviews with MeK leaders in Paris and European Parliament documents, I determined that since May 2011, the MeK leadership accepted an EU-brokered plan for Ashraf residents to be interviewed as individuals in a safe location for resettlement in third countries. They would accept any location the United Nations chooses, if it guarantees protection from and back to Ashraf, a position reiterated this week.

Eight years since the invasion and close of the U.S. military role, there is a need for a more assertive U.S. political role to create a “diplomatic umbrella” to shield moderate Iraqi parliamentarians, former U.S. direct hires but especially Washington’s Iranian allies.

The Iranian dissidents face the most serious dangers; consequently, Washington could put teeth in a demarche to Baghdad by privately conditioning a portion of economic assistance on whether Iraq consents to a U.N. team interviewing the Iranians at a secure location in a third country for resettlement outside of Iraq.

The American-supported Iraq relocation plan without protection for the residents of Ashraf is a toxic recipe for an avoidable humanitarian tragedy for which responsible American and Iraqi officials can be held accountable in international tribunals.

(Raymond Tanter, an adjunct professor in the Government Department of Georgetown University, served on the National Security Council senior staff in the Reagan administration and is author of “Terror Tagging of an Iranian Dissident Organization.”)

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Analysis/Outside-View/2011/12/23/Outside-View-Abandoning-Americas-Iraqi-and-Iranian-allies/UPI-62651324642560/#ixzz1hPMid1hb

Amnesty International: Residents of ‘Camp Shraf’ in Iraq at risk

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Between 400 and 800 Iranian nationals living in a camp in Iraq could be transferred to a new location at the end of this year. Their security could be at risk while they are being moved. Amnesty International is calling on the Iraqi authorities to ensure the ir protection .

Camp New Iraq, formerly known as Camp Ashraf, situated 60 kilometres north of Baghdad, is home to some 3,250 Iranian asylum-seekers who have lived in Iraq for some 25 years. They are associated with the Iranian opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI). The camp has been attacked several times by Iraqi security forces, most recently in April 2011, causing the deaths of dozens of residents and injuries to others.

On 15 December, the Iraqi authorities publicly confirmed their plans to close the camp on 31 December this year. In an interview with press agency Agence France Presse (AFP), Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said that the decision to close the camp was “irreversible”. On 21 December, Nuri al-Maliki announced that he had agreed to extend the deadline for closing the camp until April 2012, but wanted the camp’s residents to have left Iraq by then. However between 400 and 800 residents could be temporarily moved to another camp, known as Camp Liberty, before the end of the year. Meanwhile the residents of Camp Ashraf have agreed that 400 residents can move to Camp Liberty, if certain safeguards are in place regarding their protection. PMOI representatives have announced they are ready to negotiate this with the Iraqi government as soon as possible as well as negotiating a peaceful solution for the rest of the residents.

The office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) had previously announced in a statement that it had received a high number of asylum requests from the camp residents and was putting in place a process to assess such requests on an individual basis. This process has not yet started.

READ MORE: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE14/047/2011/en/ff519369-e233-4826-a550-567eeba8e008/mde140472011en.html

Three year siege of Ashraf, war crime and crime against humanity, not to be whitewashed

NCRI – The AFP on Wednesday December 21 quoted the United States’ State Department as follows:  “After tensions related to necessary supplies to the camp during recent months, it seems that no problem remains as to the supply of food and water but some ‘worrying’ remains on fuel supplies.” Those affirmations are completely erroneous and devoid of truth.  The Iraqi government, on strict demands from the Iranian regime, has imposed a harsh all round siege on Ashraf since three years ago, a siege strongly intensified during recent months.

  • Since the beginning of 2009 and especially during the last two years, repressive Iraqi forces have continuously hurdled the transfer of the urgently sick and the wounded to Baghdad hospitals or even those of Erbil or Baqouba, as well as blocking medical supplies to the camp.  Since April 17, 2011, no medicine has been permitted into the camp.  Twelve ill or wounded residents have died during last year because of this siege. Cases concerning those people have been referred to the United Nations and the US administration.
  • Since February 8, 2011, not a single drop of gasoline has entered the camp.  Since May 17, no diesel fuel needed for lights, heating or air conditioning units or even kitchens has been supplied to the camp.  Even the fuel needed to produce electricity has been stopped since last month, with agents of the terrorist Qods force breaking fuel pipes on December 13 to deprive the power center of the fuel. The gas reserve has thus been emptied and the power station is now out of production.  On November 2, repressive forces even prevented biomass and coal, to be used as alternate fuel, from entering the camp.
  • Repressive forces have even abstained from turning the corps of Mrs. Zahra Mehrsefat, resident of Ashraf who died on September 20 because of medical shortages, to her family.
  • Psychological torture of residents which has been going on since nearly two years, continues through 300 loudspeakers on a permanent basis.   Family members, lawyers, members of parliaments and Human rights’ activists have been barred from visiting the camp since three years.  Working by the residents to gain part of their expenses has been prohibited.

By any standard, the above mentioned points as well as a long list of shortages and pressures imposed on the camp are considered an inhuman and criminal siege.  The United Nations and the United States of America have been informed of every single violation described above.
 
The Iranian Resistance regrets the unjust and unrealistic attitude of the US State Department and calls for an international fact finding delegation to be formed in order that a true report on the dimensions of this criminal siege be produced for public awareness and for international courts.   By any standards, such a siege is considered a clear example of crime against humanity and war crime with nobody being able to whitewash it.

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 22, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11558-three-year-siege-of-ashraf-war-crime-and-crime-against-humanity-not-to-be-whitewashed

Mrs. Rajavi welcomes peaceful solution for Camp Ashraf,announces the residents’ consent for relocating 400 to Camp Liberty with provision of minimum guarantees for their security and safety

Mrs. Rajavi declares her readiness to travel to Baghdad for talks with the Government of Iraq at the presence of UN Secretary General’s Representative to Iraq, US Secretary of State’s Special Advisor on Ashraf, Special Advisor to Baroness Ashton on Ashraf, Vice-president of the European Parliament, President of the Delegation for Relations with Iraq at the European Parliament and the lawyers of Ashraf.

NCRI – Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, the President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, welcomed the peaceful resolution of the Ashraf crisis and repeated her readiness to visit Baghdad immediately to engage in discussions with the Iraqi government on arrangements to implement the plan for the peaceful resolution of Ashraf crisis and to ensure the minimum guarantees for the safe and security of 400 Ashraf residents as they relocate to Camp Liberty.

The talks should be held in presence of Ambassador Dan Fried, Special Adviser to the U.S. Secretary of State on Ashraf; Martin Kobler, the UNSG Representative to Iraq; Ambassador Jean de Ruyt, Special Adviser to Baroness Ashton on Ashraf; Dr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Vice-president of the European Parliament; Struan Stevenson, President of European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations with Iraq; and lawyers of Ashraf.

Mrs. Rajavi noted that she had already made this proposal to the Government of Iraq through the United Nations and U.S. officials, but had not yet received any response. Pressuring the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) and the Iranian Resistance to accept inhumane conditions that are demands of the Iranian regime, are unacceptable, she emphasized, especially when fraught with distortions, misrepresentations and falsifications.

Commenting on Wednesday’s remarks by Prime Minister Maliki, Mrs. Rajavi said:  “If Mr. Maliki, as he says, truly seeks the departure of PMOI from Iraq, he should have not wasted any time in the past four months and should have immediately had accepted that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees start its work in Ashraf to reaffirm the residents’ refugee status in order to resettle them in third countries.”

“Mr. Maliki claims that the PMOI has invaded an Iraqi city named Ashraf. However he conveniently forgets to acknowledge that the residents had turned this previously arid and barren piece of  land into a city during the past 25 years of  hard work  and enormous costs, and that they had certain rights.”

“More importantly,” Mrs. Rajavi said,  “Mr. Maliki deliberately remained silent about attacks on Ashraf in the past three years, including massacres of July 2009 and April 2011, in which 47 residents were killed and 1071 were wounded.  Neither did he mention that 12 residents had died due to lack of access to proper  medical services.  Instead, he referred to the terrorist designation of the PMOI by the U.S. and the clerical regime. Ironically, today the European Court of Justice categorically rejected any claim that the PMOI was terrorist.”

“It seems,  in his own words, the only red line for Mr. Maliki is refraining from ‘inflicting any harm,’ and upsetting the clerical regime.”

Mrs. Rajavi added: “Human rights principles and international law make forcible relocation illegal and the UN Secretary General, Deputy Secretary General, the UN High Commission for Refugees, the International Committee of Red Cross, UN Assistance Mission in Iraq and majorities in more than 30 parliaments have reiterated this fact.” Nevertheless, underscoring that that the GOI had not accepted the protection of Ashraf residents at Camp Liberty by the U.S., the Blue Helmets, EU forces or even private U.S. security companies,  Mrs. Rajavi said that upon the requests of the UN and the U.S., she had asked the residents of Ashraf  to accept in principle to relocate to Camp Liberty, with the minimum guarantees for their security and well-being and improvement in their conditions; the minimum humanitarian and legal guarantees that have not yet received positive response from the GOI.”

The President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, stated that the following are the minimum humanitarian and legal guarantees:

1. Safe and secure transfer of  each and every one of Ashraf residents, without exception, to Camp Liberty with their vehicles and moveable property under international observation;
2. 24/7 monitoring by the UN and the U.S. until the resettlement of the last person to the third countries;
3. Initiation of UNHCR work;
4. Iraqi forces shall be stationed outside of  fenced area of the new location to ensure security and tranquility, particularly for nearly 1,000 Muslim women;
5. Ending the siege against, and halting any persecution and harassment of, the residents and the annulment of forged warrants of arrests without exception; and
6. Selling of the fixed properties of the residents under UN supervision and reimbursing it to the residents to pay for their security, logistical expenses and transfer to third countries.

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 21, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11555-mrs-rajavi-welcomes-peaceful-solution-for-camp-ashraf-announces-the-residents-consent-for-transfer-of-400-of-them-to-camp-liberty

Iraq extends deadline for Iranian exiles to exit Camp Ashraf

ASSOCIATED PRESS

BAGHDAD (AP) – Under international pressure, the Iraqi government on Wednesday backed off its threat to close a refugee camp holding 3,400 Iranian exiles by the end of the month.

Instead, Iraq said it will shut Camp Ashraf sometime in January and insisted that all its residents must leave the country by April. It promised not to deport anyone to Iran.

A spokeswoman for the exiles responded positively to elements of the plan and insisted that the U.S. and U.N. guarantee their safety. The extension of the deadline raises the likelihood of a peaceful resolution to the standoff, heading off a possible bloodbath that many international observers have feared.

The future of Camp Ashraf, home to exiles dedicated to the overthrow of the Iranian regime, has been a sticking point for Iraq’s Shiite-led government, which counts Iran as an ally.

The armed People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran first moved to the camp during the regime of Saddam Hussein, who saw the group as a convenient ally against Tehran. U.S. soldiers disarmed them during the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has been determined to close down the camp, located in barren terrain northeast of Baghdad about 50 miles from the Iranian border. His government considers the camp, which the exiles vigorously defend with a sophisticated public relations operation in the West, as an affront to Iraq’s sovereignty.

“We don’t want to hand them over to Iran. We don’t want to kill them. We don’t want to oppress them and we don’t want to starve them. But their presence in Iraq is illegal and illegitimate,” al-Maliki said during a press conference Wednesday, three days after the last U.S. soldiers left the country.

The Iraqi government had vowed to shut the camp completely by the end of December and move the residents to another location. That raised concerns that forcibly removing them would result in violence, and the United Nations has been trying to broker a deal.

The U.N. has said that at least 34 people were killed in a raid on the camp by Iraqi security forces last April.

On Wednesday, Iraqi spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said the government had worked out a plan to move up to 800 of the residents to a new facility in Baghdad by the end of December. That facility is a former American military base called Camp Liberty.

Al-Dabbagh said the rest of the residents would be relocated as soon as possible in January. Once they have all moved, Camp Ashraf would be closed. He said all the camp’s residents would then be relocated outside of Iraq by no later than April.

In a statement Wednesday, the head of the People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, Maryam Rajavi, welcomed a peaceful solution for Camp Ashraf. She said she has asked the Ashraf residents to relocate to Camp Liberty provided certain conditions are observed including U.S. and U.N. monitoring.

Al-Dabbagh said the plan calls for camp residents who are citizens of non-Iranian countries to move there eventually. But most of the residents have only Iranian citizenship, so homes in other countries would have to be found for them as well. He said no one will be forcibly sent back to Iran and that they would be treated well at Camp Liberty.

A U.S. State Department spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, said Wednesday that the process of moving the residents to a new location and eventually resettling them would take time.

“We’re gratified to see that the Iraqi government is going to give it a little bit more time and that they’re particularly cooperating well with the U.N. process,” she said.

For all the discussion over Camp Ashraf, little is known about the inside of the camp or its residents’ day-to-day lives. The Iraqi government generally does not allow journalists to visit.

The road to Camp Ashraf is heavily guarded with signs warning people against taking photographs. The Iraqi Army keeps people from getting too close, and all that’s visible of the camp are towers from which troops monitor the inhabitants.

The residents complain that they don’t get proper medical treatment or enough fuel in the winter. And they accuse the Iraqi government of harassing them through hundreds of loudspeakers stationed around the camp, blaring insults and threats around the clock.

Iraqi guards outside Camp Ashraf say it’s the residents, not the security officials, who hurl insults with loudspeakers. They also contend that the residents regularly attack the soldiers with stones. The guards say the residents have regular access to medical care, and that the only items withheld are possible poisons and explosives.

The guards did not want to be identified because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

The U.S. State Department has said it does not know of any limits on food or water but that there were concerns over making sure the residents had enough fuel.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/story/2011-12-21/camp-ashraf-iran-iraq-exiles/52146682/1

Sounding the alarm on Camp Ashraf

TORONTO STAR

While the world prepares to celebrate the beginning of the New Year, the people of Camp Ashraf, Iraq, live in imminent peril. At the camp — set up by American forces — 3,400 Iranian refugees are facing prospective massacre at the hands of the Iraqi government. The majority of residents have survived until now because of U.S. protection, but with American forces leaving by the end of the year, the Iraqi government has imposed an arbitrary deadline of Dec. 31 for residents to leave. Those who have nowhere to go will likely be attacked and killed; yet, the international community has been largely silent to their plight.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has designated residents of Camp Ashraf as asylum seekers, and decries its lack of access to them. We know that the residents of Camp Ashraf have faced ongoing harassment and intimidation by both the Iraqi and Iranian governments. Indeed, twice this year alone residents of the camp have been indiscriminately killed and wounded.

The residents are predominately Iranians who oppose Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s regime and strive for a free and democratic Iran. In what may be viewed as a double death sentence, when the deadline is passed they are likely to be summarily murdered by Iraqi forces, or find themselves forcefully transferred back to Iran — where they will face the same targeted persecution that has met countless others who courageously resist Ahmadinejad’s regime. Meanwhile, reports on the ground indicate that the Iraqi army is gearing up for an attack, raising fears that residents may not even be safe at Ashraf until Dec. 31.

Over the past two weeks, the House of Commons subcommittee on international human rights — of which I am vice-chair — heard chilling testimony from witnesses, including former United States attorney general Michael Mukasey — a staunch advocate for protecting the residents of Camp Ashraf — who stated plainly: “The Iraqi government has made it clear that they will . . . go in there with troops and kill people wholesale. Either that or they will redistribute them within Iraq to locations where they can be disposed of out of sight of the international community.”

We also heard from retired U.S. army colonel Wesley Martin — the first full colonel to command Camp Ashraf — who said of the U.S. war in Iraq: “We’ve made a lot of mistakes, and many people have paid the ultimate price for those mistakes. Unless positive steps are taken very quickly, 3,400 residents of Camp Ashraf will be the next to pick up the tab.”

Indeed, the subcommittee was so moved it adopted a unanimous resolution calling on the Government of Canada — in concert with our international partners — to undertake immediate action to help ensure the lives of those at Camp Ashraf are not in jeopardy.

In particular, we called upon the government of Iraq to extend the deadline for residents to leave beyond Dec. 31 and to allow international observers and aid groups into Camp Ashraf — including to interview residents individually to find out their eligibility for refugee status. Further, we called upon the Government of Canada — in conjunction with our allies — to seek a UN Security Council resolution putting a protective force in place to ensure the safety of refugees at Camp Ashraf; Moreover, the committee called upon the United States to fulfill its moral and legal obligations toward the residents of Camp Ashraf and not forget about those who will be left behind when U.S. troops leave Iraq.

As the world prepares to ring in a new year, let us act to protect the people of Camp Ashraf from certain displacement and likely death and resolve to hold the Government of Iraq to account for its actions. The time to act on Ashraf is now; tomorrow may be too late.

Irwin Cotler is the Member of Parliament for Mount Royal and a former minister of justice and attorney general of Canada. He is vice-chair of the subcommittee on international human rights.

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1103599–sounding-the-alarm-on-camp-ashraf

As US troops leave Iraq, an assault is planned that should shame us all

THE SUNDAY TELEGRAPH

A tragedy is presently unfolding in Iraq that makes a mockery of the boast by US defence secretary Leon Panetta that American forces are leaving it a “free, independent and sovereign country”. And in two weeks’ time it seems set to come to a bloody climax.

For some years this column has been drawing attention to the horrible threat that hangs over Camp Ashraf, the once neatly-ordered town on the Iranian border which has, since 2001, been home to 3,400 Iranian exiles, members of the People’s Mujahideen of Iran (PMOI), the leading group opposed to the tyranny of the mullahs in Tehran.

In 2004, the Ashraf residents surrendered their arms in return for personal written guarantees of safety from US General David Phillips. But for months now, in anticipation of the last US forces leaving Iraq, Ashraf has been besieged by thousands of Iraqi troops, under the personal direction of prime minister Nouri al-Maliki. They are acting in league with gangs of thugs from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Tehran’s equivalent of the old Soviet KGB, responsible for ruthless suppression at home and fostering terrorism abroad.

On a recent visit to Washington, Maliki openly admitted that he was preparing to close Ashraf on December 31, at Tehran’s behest. In April an assault on the town left 36 dead and 11 more have died in incidents since. In a fortnight’s time, Ashraf will be invaded and its residents are likely to be slaughtered on the spot or dispersed around Iraq, to be killed at a later date, or deported to face imprisonment or death in Iran.

No one is more anguished by this betrayal, as he recently indicated in a speech, than General Phillips.

But what is most bewildering about the tragedy is the apparent desire of the US and British governments to condone Maliki’s collaboration with the murderous intentions of Tehran – despite protests from an impressive array of former senior US officials and thousands of American and European politicians, including more than 100 from our own Parliament. Why has our Government been so keen to bow to Iran’s wishes, paving the way for the destruction of Ashraf by those same Revolutionary Guards who recently sacked our embassy in Tehran?

Britain’s opaque part in this story has been as disgraceful as anything in the humiliating record of our involvements in Iraq – which is neither free nor independent, and is less of a sovereign country today than it was when ruled by Saddam Hussein.

http://www.iranfocus.com/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24214:as-us-troops-leave-iraq-an-assault-is-planned-that-should-shame-us-all

A Humanitarian Catastrophe at Ashraf Spells Political Catastrophe for the White House

 THE AMERICAN THINKER

U.S. troops are set to completely withdraw from Iraq on the 31st of December.  That is also the date for another more ominous deadline: al-Maliki’s government has ordered what looks to be a bloody attack on innocent political refugees on that very same day, despite strong condemnations from human rights groups, parliamentarians, and journalists from around the world.  Maliki’s order to empty Camp Ashraf, which will no doubt lead to a massacre, came after his meeting with the Iranian leader Khamenei.  Dispersion of the camp residents no doubt will resemble what happened to the Jewish community during the Second World War. 

The attack will target the 3,400 residents of Ashraf, or “Camp New Iraq,” who are Iranian political dissidents hated by Iraq’s powerful neighbor.  The camp has been attacked by Iraqi forces twice before, once in April this year and once in 2009, and in total more than 47 of the civilian residents were killed — either shot or run over by armored vehicles.  At present the camp is inhumanely blockaded by Iraqi troops who prevent medical and other vital supplies, journalists, human rights groups, and parliamentarians from entering.  Al-Maliki is now summoned by the tribunal court in Spain for crime against humanity.  The fact is that the Iraqi government’s plan is now to disperse rather than allowing the U.N. high commissioner for refugees the time needed to safely resettle the residents in Europe. 

The residents of the camp have a complicated history.  They fled Iran after tens of thousands of political dissidents were executed by the Khomeini regime in the eighties.  They were welcomed in Iraq, which, with the support of Western governments, was at war with Iran.  Most of the residents have lived in or near Ashraf now for a quarter-century and have built lives, schools, and a beautiful mosque there.  They were also integral in revealing the Iranian secret nuclear facilities.  As a source of inspiration, they are important to the “Persian Spring.”  All in all, this is more than enough to put them on the regime’s death list. 

The residents also have a complicated history with the U.S.  In 1997, as a gesture of goodwill to the “moderate” Khatami government in Iran, the U.S. put the residents (or rather the organization many of them belong to) on the State Department list of foreign terrorist organizations, without any factual basis.  In the EU and Britain, courts have declared terror designations of this organization “perverse” and removed them.  Despite a federal court ruling ordering the designation to be reviewed, the removal process is being stalled for political reasons in the U.S. by the State Department.  At the same time, the residents of Ashraf have been protected by and had very good relationships with U.S. troops, been designated as protected persons by the U.S. under the fourth Geneva Convention, and have been declared U.S. allies by chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, FBI directors, and other prominent members of the intelligence community.

 But never mind this complicated history — the facts of the current situation remain.  On the last day of this year, President Obama will participate in a ceremony analogous to standing on the deck of an aircraft carrier underneath a banner reading “Mission Accomplished.”  CNN will show footage of the last U.S. troops leaving Iraq.  On split-screen, they will show thousands of Iraqi troops pouring into a refugee camp with the purpose of “dispersing” the residents across Iraq.  In practice, this will mean firing indiscriminately at civilians, burning buildings, dragging severely ill men and women out of the clinic, running people over with trucks, and kidnapping residents to be tortured.  All of this has happened in Ashraf before.  Twice.  See YouTube if you don’t believe it.  The residents will not go quietly, because they know that they will be going to their deaths.  Their unarmed and peaceful resistance will be met by deadly violence by U.S.-trained forces under the command of an Iran-friendly budding dictator. 

The residents of Ashraf enjoy as wide bipartisan support as any issue in Washington today.  But that support will quickly translate into a very pointed and harsh critique by the Republicans of how the Obama administration, for political reasons, is abandoning U.S. allies in its rush to leave Iraq.  The Republican candidates will, with good reason, attack the president’s failed Iran policy.  They already have, but now there will be blood on the administration’s hands to prove the point.  The split-screen video described above will prove to be a political nightmare for the president. 

Human rights advocates, U.S. allies, and family members of the residents have pleaded with the administration to take action — to pressure Iraq to cancel its deadline for the “closure” of the camp and allow the UNHCR to do its work.  Their humanitarian pleas have fallen on deaf ears.  It is with a sad heart that one can note that the residents’ best hope of survival is the political survival instincts of President Obama.  Perhaps the administration will listen if it becomes clear that its members have electoral skin in the game, and not just a moral responsibility.  Voters are looking for true leadership — and I, for one — hope that the president will display it in saving 3,400 lives in Ashraf. 

Henrik Hermansson is a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Political Science, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/a_humanitarian_catastrophe_at_ashraf_spells_political_catastrophe_for_the_white_house.html

Iraq’s Maliki Unleashes Moqtada Sadr’s Hired Mob against Iranian Exiles in Camp Ashraf

StopFundamentalism.com

According to reports from Iraq, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, directed by the Iranian government, has unleashed the Moqtada Sadr’s hired mobs against the Iranian dissidents in Camp Ashraf.

Faced with increasing opposition from various political circles in Iraq to his stance toward the Iranian opposition Mujahedin-e Khalq whose members reside in Camp Ashraf, Maliki intends to use Moqtada Sadr’s followers who are paid with Iranian money to pressure the camp’s residents.

Since Maliki entered the Iranian-arranged alliance with Moqtada Sadr in order to secure his position as prime minister, he has increasingly used Sadr’s loyalists as street shock troops to attack Iraqis protesting Maliki’s affiliation with Iran rulers. Use of state-sponsored mobs for fulfilling state’s political and suppressive objectives has its roots in the post-1979 Iran where the government unleashed them to attack opposition rallies and storm foreign embassies.

According to a report by the Associated Press from Iraq, several hundred Iraqi followers of Moqtada Sadr (out of seven million strong population of Baghdad) took part in a gathering on Friday, hoisting his large size pictures and shouting slogan against the MEK. They repeated the Iranian government’s demand for the closing of Camp Ashraf and the group’s forcible relocation to an Iraqi-run detention center. Other reports from Baghdad indicate the heavy presence of the Iranian embassy staff in the state-run rally and Farsi speaking individuals who were organizing the mob.

Last September, the Iranian Fars News Agency affiliated with the country’s notorious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, quoted Moqtada Sadr as calling for closure of Camp Ashraf and expulsion of its residents.

On Saturday, December 16, the main Iraqi radio Aswat al-Iraq quoted the spokesman of the Iraqiya opposition coalition as saying that forcible transfer of Camp Ashraf residents to another place in Iraq is “an Iranian intelligence project” Member of Iraq’s Parliament Haidar al-Mulla told Aswat al-Iraq that there “a well-known political agenda, moved by Iranian intelligence to transfer the residents of the camp, which is rejected by us.”  He added that “Iraqiya bloc demanded appointing observers to protect the camp, and to initiate quick actions by the United Nations on this matter.”

Observer fear the sudden emergence of state-sponsored mobs in Baghdad and around Camp Ashraf in recent days, in addition to significant movement of military personnel and vehicles in and around Camp Ashraf, all point to an extensive attack by Maliki against unarmed and defenseless residents of the Camp.

Maliki has so far defied calls by the UN Secretary Genera’s special representative in Iraq, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, European Union, and a bi-partisan group in the US Congress, to postpone the closing of Camp Ashraf so that there is time for the UN refugee agency to process the camp’s 3,400 residents’ applications for political refugee status. His continued defiance of the international community and his countless breach of the human rights of the camp’s residents since 2009, including two large scale massacres in 2009 and 2011, leave no doubt that Maliki’s Iranian-engineered plan to relocate the residents to a so-called safe place is in reality a one-way trip to death chambers for the Iranian dissidents with nearly 1,000 women among them.

http://blogs.stopfundamentalism.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=68:iraqs-maliki-unleashes-moqtada-sadrs-hired-mob-against-iranian-exiles-in-camp-ashraf